And those famous exports, which dropped by an astonishing annual 35% in December, accounted for 61 percent of the growth in the last expansion, an expansion which was the longest in over 60 years. What this means, bluntly put, is that until exports recover there isn't much likelihood of any more general economic recovery, and exports won't recover till global trade starts to expand again, and the bank and credit crisis is over, which means you can pretty much forget about 2009 as far as I can see.
Thus we are over to "do the best you can under the circumstances" mode, and to applying some sort of fiscal stimulus. And of course, Prime Minister Taro Aso has not been backward in coming forward in this regard (especially with elections looming at some point), and his second stimulus package has now been passed by the Lower House. But here comes the shocker - the package provides for an actual increase in deficit spending of a mere 1% of GDP - a drop in the bucket when you are talking about your worst recession since WWII. Even worse, the proposed fiscal 2009 budget - which begins on April 1 - provides no new stimulus. Newspaper reports which mention an increase in spending of 6.5% are misleading since they compare the proposed budget for fiscal 2009 with the initial budget for fiscal 2008. But the final budget for fiscal 2008, actually included two supplementary budgets, and the final readout ended up being a tad higher than what is currently proposed for 2009.
However even with spending staying flat (on the rather dubious assumption of no further packages) the Japanese government will still need to sell 33.3 trillion yen of new debt, the most in four years, since the economic contraction means there will be a revenue shortfall. The so-called primary budget deficit, the excess of spending over revenue excluding bond sales and interest payments, will balloon to 13.1 trillion yen from this year’s 5.2 trillion yen. And here we have Japan's dilemma, since something needs to be done to soften the blow of this recession, but with debt having been allowed to expand so rapidly over the last decade (see chart below), there really are limits on how much can responsibly be done.

The most obvious problem is that increasing spending at a time when tax revenue is falling threatens the government’s goal of balancing the budget by 2011. But Aso has already indicated that the government shouldn’t prioritize fiscal discipline when the economy is ailing, and so far as it goes the argument is reasonable. This is a "once in a lifetime" crisis (we hope) and so once in a lifetime measures are in order. It's just that Japan has now been busily taking "once in a lifetime measures" for over a decade, and we still don't seem to be getting anywhere. But we are ballooning government debt. Many quibble with the widely quoted 2008 OECD debt to GDP number of 182%, since it is a figure for gross debt (which the OECD can easily justify for reasons that we don't need to get into here). But look at the green line above which shows net debt, this has also been rising and rising, and is now near to 100% of GDP on IMF data. The point is we have just been through the longest expansion in over 60 years, and yet at no point did net debt to GDP start to fall. This is the real core of the problem that Japan faces in 2009, that previous fiscal policy did not attack the growing fiscal deficit in the good times, so there is little room to manoeuvre in the bad ones. Which is why the Japan economic outlook in 2009 is grim, grim and nothing but grim.
Update: Reatail Sales Fall Again In December
Japan’s retail sales posted the largest decline in almost four years in Decemebr as households cut back on their spending and began to worry about job security. Sales were down 2.7 percent year on yaer, the biggest drop since February 2005, according to Trade Ministry data.

Japan’s consumers became the most pessimistic in at least 26 years in December, indicating households are likely to keep cutting back on spending as the recession deepens. The confidence index dropped to 26.2 from 28.4 in November, according to the Cabinet Office last week, the lowest since the government began compiling the figures in 1982.









11 comments:
Perhaps they could sell some of their holdings of Treasuries? Setser today details how private and government investors have been flocking to Treasuries...the BoJ could cash in without causing a shock to the market, possibly. Of course, I presume your net debt figures are net of those Treasury holdings, so it is a facetious suggestion.
Another possibility would be to follow Bernanke's proposition and "helicopter drop" cash in some fashion directly to consumers. That would possibly stimulate domestic consumption and conceivably weaken the yen versus the dollar; both desirable for Japan's financial leadership.
I spoke with Japanese coworkers about why Japanese don't loosen their pocketbooks given their high savings rates, and the answer was the force of habit and memory of hard times kept people's wallets in their pockets.
the proposed fiscal 2009 budget - which begins on April 1 - provides no new stimulus.
First, I think this is good, as I'm tired of seeing the GOJ waste my stolen tax money. Second, it's going to come in a setup supplemental budget in the runup to the lower house election.
Scott,
Given the weak yen, I think its highly unlikely Japan will start selling treasuries. The opposite might even happen, in an attempt to weaken the yen.
Another possibility would be to follow Bernanke's proposition and "helicopter drop" cash in some fashion directly to consumers.
This is going to happen. We're all getting 12,000 yen. Whoopie! It's a massively unpopular move, with about 70% of the public saying its a waste of government money. It will not spur domestic spending. I'm planning on shipping that money out of the country as soon as I get it.
Also, savings rates are no longer that high. It's a myth that has persisted.
Ken,
Very interesting information. Undoubtedly the cash handout isn't getting much attention in the US at least, due to our own problems. I am going to poke into the savings rate issue; wide acceptance of the idea that Japanese are no longer saving would change world views of Japan.
Ken
"We're all getting 12,000 yen."
Be a responsible citizen: buy a (govt.) lottery ticket or support a charity for the homeless....
Zenibako
Anonymous,
Yes, I was being facetious in my earlier comment. I do intend to donate half of my stimulus bribe to charity, though I've not yet decided which one. I might even put up a poll at JEN to let the users choose.
Blog subhead:
"It's Aging Population Problem"
should be...
"Its Aging Population Problem"
--- no apostrophe.
"It's Aging Population Problem"
should be...
"Its Aging Population Problem"
Hey thanks, it's been years, and I never noticed this silly typo. Since December 2002, would you believe. Anyway. I think it's correct now.
Handing out cash is no good. Japan should learn from Taiwan, which already hand out about the same amount in Consumption Coupons, not cash. The Coupons is good only when SPENT in targeted time period.
What is "gross government debt" ? And what is "net government debt" ?
"What is "gross government debt" ? And what is "net government debt" ?"
Well this isn't to difficult a question, although spelling out the details would be a lot harder.
Gross debt is just what it says, the total liabilities in the name of the Japanese government, and its subordinate entities. As expressed, eg, in outstanding government bonds.
Net debt is simply the above minus everything that could be counted as an asset, eg land that the government owns, and which could be sold to cover debt, cash in regional bank accounts, toxic assets bought under keep to maturity rules whose real value know one really knows, etc, etc, etc. That is, the gross number is a more or less precisely defined one (which is why the OECD prefer it), while the second one is much more vague.
Post a Comment